Why open source needs an open geographic dataset.
Open source has won. The fact that free software now dominates
practically every sector of computing (with the main exception of the
desktop) is proof of that. But there is something even more important
than the victory of open source itself, and that is the wider success of
the underlying approach it embodies. People often forget just how radical
the idea of open, collaborative development seemed when it appeared in
the 1990s. Although it is true that this philosophy was the norm in
the very earliest days of the field, that culture was soon forgotten
with the rapid rise of commercial computing, which swept everything
before it in the pursuit of handsome profits. There, a premium was
placed on maintaining trade secrets and of excluding competitors.
But the appearance of GNU and Linux, along with the other open software
projects that followed, provided repeated proof that the older approach
was better for reasons that are obvious upon reflection.
Open, collaborative development allows people to build on the work of
others, instead of wastefully re-inventing the wheel, and it enables the best
solutions to be chosen on technical, rather than commercial, grounds.
The ability to work on areas of personal interest, rather than on those
assigned by managers, encourages new talent to join projects in order
to pursue their passions, while the non-discriminatory global reach of
the open method means that the pool of contributors is much larger than
for conventional approaches. However, none of those advantages is tied
to software: they can be applied to many fields. And that is precisely
what has happened in the last two decades, with the ideas underlying
free software producing astonishing results elsewhere.